For those who have undergone deep vein thrombosis, or other health issues involving blood clotting, IVCs are a treatment. It is a shield against pulmonary embolism and is often put at the lower extremity.
Using an IVC filter is part of a growing tendency within the medical community. But modern filter designs are radically different from what the medical community needed to work inside the early 2000s. Producers worked to create more low-profile apparatus, and that has resulted in unexpected complications for most individuals. But why exactly are the IVC filter manufacturers accountable for the complications which patients encounter?
Understanding the Physician’s Position
When doctors are treating acute conditions like deep vein thrombosis, they are often seeking to reduce the threat to the individual as fast and as much as you can. Doctors often know these devices can pose a substantial threat and it’s possible that they could break, migrate, and an assortment of other issues. So why do physicians still use these implants?
An IVC filter is still among the best ways to mitigate the probability of pulmonary embolism. On the other hand, the problem comes from the suggested removal of this device. Many recommend that the apparatus should be removed whenever the patient’s risk of pulmonary embolism has decreased to a reasonable level. In fact, many advocates call for the quick removal of a filter as a preventative measure for complications such as filter fracture and much more.
Removal is Not Always Suggested
One reason why IVC filter makers are the ones responsible for complications is that the removal of the device isn’t necessarily suggested. In fact, many manufacturers promote that IVC filters are a long-term alternative and ought to remain in position for as long as possible. The medical community is starting to see that this information isn’t sound.
There is another element that is related to the elimination of the device. One of the biggest problems that come with IVC filter implants is that medical teams are led to believe that they are structurally sound and should hold up within the human body for a very long period.
In two recent studies, roughly 443 filters were implanted with the intention of removal, but only 7% were successfully removed. At the ending of the studies, it had been shown that lower approval rates were likely the result of poor follow-up protocol and bad health. The producers aren’t enthusiastic enough with their clients, those in the medical community and the sufferers are individuals who suffer.
IVC Hazards and Health Factors
Common hazards or health factors that come in addition to the setup of an IVC filter can include fracture or migration of the device.
Physicians report symptoms such as persistent chest pain and shortness of breath. Others have reported pain in their abdomen, and regardless of where the filter migrates to, pain is a very frequent symptom. It is likely that an IVC filter can break, migrate, or become clogged and result in potentially deadly consequences.
Although modern filter designs have decreased morbidity and mortality, they are not without complications. It’s vital that medical teams operate with their patients to weigh the risks and determine when it would be right to remove the implant. With IVC filter installation there’s a point where the probability of DVT is low enough that the danger of IVC complications would be the more critical issue.
Get Help Filing a Lawsuit for IVC Filter Damages
Anyone who has undergone IVC filter damages should discuss the subject with an IVC filter attorney. These producers are well known for skirting on providing information to the health community and dissuading medical teams from eliminating apparatus. Understand what choices you need to recover the harm connected to the IVC filter complications.
It is very likely that those who experience complications have unnecessary medical statements to handle or bills they wouldn’t have had if the device was treated appropriately. And of course, the assortment of pain and suffering, and time missed from work because of the further operations and time to recover.